Patna High Court
Munna Kushwaha @ Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond, sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Munna Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act for alleged possession of 40 litres of country-made liquor seized from two vehicles. The liquor was recovered from a Hero Passion Pro motorcycle and a black scooty, the latter being registered in the petitioner's name, though he claimed he was not present at the scene and had no knowledge of the seizure. The prosecution argued that ownership of the scooty linked the petitioner to the offence, while the defence highlighted his clean antecedent and lack of physical presence. The court examined the facts, noted the petitioner’s claim of non‑presence and clean record, and considered the statutory provisions governing anticipatory bail. Applying Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the court granted anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to verification of antecedents and other conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite the vehicle registered in his name being used to transport illegal liquor.
- Whether ownership of the vehicle alone suffices to establish participation in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act.
- Whether the court may impose conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illegal liquor
- prohibition law
- excise law
- seizure
- clean antecedent
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34237 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2026 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas
======================================================
Munna Kushwaha @ Munna Kumar S/O Vijay Singh R/o Village- Madaripur,
P.S-Tillouthu, District- Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 19-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Tillouthu P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026, registered under
Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been
lodged on the basis of the written information given by the
informant to the effect that while he was on routine patrolling
along with police personnel, he saw two vehicles i.e. one Hero
Passion Pro and one black colour scooty coming. Upon seeing
the police party, both the persons, who were riding the vehicles
tried to flee away, however they were apprehended by the police
personnel present there. The arrested persons disclosed their
names as Ashish Kumar and the person, who was driving the
black colour scooty disclosed his name as Aditya Kumar @
Monu. Upon search, 25 liter of country made liquor was
recovered from the Hero Passion Pro motorcycle and 15 liter of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34237 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
2/3
country made liquor was recovered from Black colour scooty
and the alleged country made liquor was seized and the seizure
list was prepared.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and has
been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the
petitioner has got no concern with the alleged seized liquor and,
since he was not present at the place of occurrence, nothing has
been recovered from him. His name transpired in the present
case, since he happens to be the owner of the Black colour
scooty, which was taken away by his villager, namely, Aditya
Kumar @ Monu on the said date of occurrence. He further
submits that the petitioner has got a clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the
prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties
and after going through the records, it appears that total 40 liters
of country made liquor has been recovered from two vehicles.
One of the seized vehicle i.e. black colour Scooty, from which
15 liter of country made liquor was recovered, being driven by
Aditya Kumar @ Monu, was registered in the name of the
petitioner and on the basis of the said recovery and seizure, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34237 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
3/3
name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case. He was
not even present at the place of occurrence. The petitioner has
got a clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances, let the petitioner, above named in the event of
arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special
Judge Excise, Court No. 11, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with
Tillouthu P.S. Case No. 25 of 2026, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and subject to the following condition:-
(I) That the learned court concerned shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it
is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the court concerned shall take step for cancellation
of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
Ajay/Kunal/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.