Patna High Court
Pujan Pasi @ Pujan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, surety, and verification of criminal antecedent.
Summary
The petitioner, Pujan Pasi, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly selling country‑made liquor near the bank of the Kau River. Police recovered 32 litres of suspected illicit liquor from the river and, based on the identification of a chowkidar present at the scene, named the petitioner and another individual as the offenders, although the petitioner was not present at the location and no liquor was seized from him. The petitioner, asserting his innocence and clean antecedent, applied for anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the evidence, noting the lack of direct recovery from the petitioner and his clean record, and consequently ordered anticipatory bail subject to bond and surety conditions and verification of antecedents under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail when the only identification of the accused is by a chowkidar and no contraband was recovered from the accused's possession?
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- prohibition act
- excise law
- country‑made liquor
- identification by witness
- clean antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34243 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2025 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas
======================================================
Pujan Pasi @ Pujan Chaudhary Son of Baban Pasi @ Baban Chaudhary
Resident of Village- Satyanarayan Tola, Balchandwa, P.S.- Bikramganj,
District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Meena Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 19-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 258 of 2025, registered under
Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
(Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been
lodged on the basis of the written report submitted by the
informant to the effect that while the informant, along with the
police party was on a patrolling duty, he received a secret
information that the petitioner and one Upendra Pasi were
selling country made liquor near the bank of Kau river. To verify
the authenticity of the information received by the informant, he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34243 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
2/4
proceeded towards the place of occurrence. Upon seeing the
police party, two persons started fleeing away and managed to
escape. The Chowkidar, who was present along with the police
party, identified the persons, who fled away as the petitioner and
Upendra Pasi. A search was conducted at the place, from where
in an abandoned plastic box, 32 liters of liquid, which is
suspected to be country made liquor, was recovered and a
seizure list was prepared.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence,
rather the alleged recovery of 32 liters of country made liquor is
said to have been made from the bank of Kau river, which is a
open place and accessible to all. The petitioner was not present
at the place of occurrence and his name transpired in the present
case only on the basis of information/identification of the
Chowkidar. He further submits that nothing has been recovered
from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has got
no concern with the alleged/seized liquor. He further submits
that the petitioner has got a clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the
prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34243 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
3/4
and after going through the records, it appears that 32 liters of
country made liquor was recovered from the bank of river Kau
and the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. His
name transpired in the present case, only on the basis of the
identification of the Chowkidar, who was present along with the
police party on the date of occurrence. Apart from the said
identification, nothing has come against the petitioner and, since
he was not present at the place of occurrence, no recovery is
said to have been made from the petitioner. The petitioner has
got a clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and
circumstances, let the petitioner, above named in the event of
arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special
Judge, Excise Court No. - I, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection
with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 258 of 2025, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and subject to the following
condition:-
(I) That the learned court concerned shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34243 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
4/4
is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the court concerned shall take step for cancellation
of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
Ajay/Kunal/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.