Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sumita Tudu @ SunitaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The bail application was allowed, granting the petitioner release on bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Sumita Tudu, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 37 litres of illicit country-made liquor from her residence, alleged to be in violation of sections 30, 34, 44 read with sections 32 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. She contended that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, was falsely implicated, and had only one prior criminal antecedent, having been in custody since 6 April 2026. The State opposed her bail application. The High Court, after considering the facts, the period of custody, and the nature of the allegations, allowed the bail application, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the Special Judge, Excise, Kishanganj. The Court clarified that its observations were prima facie and not a determination on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving recovery of illicit liquor and a prior criminal antecedent.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34258 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2023 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Sumita Tudu @ Sunita W/o Late Budhu Hembram R/o vill - Nawab Jagir
                 Bangama, P.s.- Katihar, Distt.- Katihar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in Bahadurganj P.S. Case

                   No. 286 of 2023 registered under sections 30, 34, 44 read with

                   Section 32 & 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. There is recovery of 37 litres of illicit country made

                   liquor from the house of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no

                   concern with the seized recovery. Petitioner has one criminal

                   antecedent and he is in custody since 06.04.2026.

                                5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34258 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                      and the period of custody, this bail application is allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Kishanganj

                      /concerned court below in connection with Bahadurganj P.S.

                      Case No. 286 of 2023.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                                (Ansul, J)

Ranjeet/-Nitesh

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.