Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Roshani Khatoon @ Soni KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail and granted it subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Roshani Khatoon, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Shikarpur P.S. Case No.10/2026) alleged under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The prosecution alleged that the daughter of an informant was killed for non‑payment of dowry, and the petitioner was implicated as the sister‑in‑law of the deceased. The petitioner contended she lived separately, had no involvement in the family’s affairs, and possessed no criminal record, asserting false implication. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Court, applying Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., granted anticipatory bail on condition of a bail bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, subject to further conditions. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in the alleged dowry‑death case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry death
  • Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34344 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Roshani Khatoon @ Soni Khatoon W/o Sarajul Ansari @ Merajul Ansari R/o
                 Village - Pokhariya, P.S.- Shikarpur, District - West Champaran
                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                  The matter has been taken up today through video

                   conferencing.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               3. The Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in

                   connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 10/2026 registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the

                   BNS.

                                4. As per the prosecution case, the daughter of the

                   informant was done to death for non-fulfillment of demand of

                   dowry.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

                   this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a

                   lady and happens to be the sister-in-law (Gotani) of the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34344 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        deceased. It has also been submitted that the petitioner lived

                        separately and had no concern with the day-to-day affairs of the

                        deceased and her husband. Moreover, the petitioner herself is

                        the daughter-in-law of the family, and no presumption can be

                        drawn against her. Lastly, it has been submitted that the

                        petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.

                                     6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                        opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                     7. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                                     8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                        of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of her

                        arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

                        enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

                        10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

                        West Champaran, in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No.

                        10/2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                        482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

                                     9. This application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.