Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dilip Giri @ Dilip Kumar GiriversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, given the lack of conscious possession and the claim of lawful purchase, anticipatory bail may be granted subject to the statutory conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Dilip Giri and Suresh Giri, were implicated in a case alleging theft of 20 litres of diesel from a standing truck, alleged under Sections 317(5), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. They contended that the diesel was purchased for agricultural purposes and that it was recovered near the shop of a third party, Bullet Giri, who was not made an accused. The petitioners argued that there was no conscious possession of the diesel by them and that they have no prior criminal record. The State opposed the anticipatory bail application. Considering the lack of evidence of possession, the purchase claim, and the petitioners' clean record, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the absence of conscious possession of the alleged stolen diesel
  • Whether the material on record discloses a prima facie case under Sections 317(5), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. are appropriate

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • diesel theft
  • possession
  • Section 317
  • Section 303
  • Section 3
  • Bihar
  • Cr.P.C. 438
  • B.N.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3455 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Dilip Giri @ Dilip Kumar Giri Son of Suresh Giri Resident of Village -
                  Rampur Khajuriya, P.S. - Dumariyaghat, District - East Champaran.
           2.     Suresh Giri Son of Bhirgun Giri Resident of Village - Rampur Khajuriya,
                  P.S. - Dumariyaghat, District - East Champaran.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Madhurendra Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Murli Dhar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under Sections

                   317(5), 303(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                3. The allegation upon the petitioner is that of stealing

                   20 liters of diesel from a standing truck.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners were not apprehended from the spot and the diesel

                   was recovered near the shop of one Bullet Giri who was not

                   made an accused and moreover, the diesel was in fact purchased

                   by the petitioners for agricultural purposes.

                                5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3455 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       the learned APP for the State.

                                    6.    Taking      into     consideration   the   facts   and

                       circumstances and also considering the fact that there is no

                       recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners and

                       moreover the diesel had been purchased by the petitioners for

                       agricultural purposes and not stolen, let the above named

                       petitioners, who have no criminal antecedent, in the event of

                       their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

                       period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on

                       furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                       each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                       of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor

                       court in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 255 of

                       2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

                       (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.