Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajkishor Chaudhary @ Rajkishor KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajkishor Chaudhary, was named in an FIR (Nawalpur PS Case No. 22/2026) alleging assault with a knife and causing injury, under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident, that there was a delay unrecorded in the FIR, and that the injury was simple. The State opposed, maintaining that the petitioner was responsible for the assault. The Court noted the petitioner’s clean criminal record, the simplicity of the injury, and the delay in filing the FIR, and therefore granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with stringent conditions. The bail order required a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, regular appearances before police and court, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or committing further offences.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. in view of the alleged assault and the delay in filing the FIR.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act
  • assault
  • delay in FIR
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34569 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2026 Thana- Nawalpur District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Rajkishor Chaudhary @ Rajkishor Kumar S/o Dalan Chaudhary @ Lalan
                 Chaudhary Resident of Village- Piprahiya, P.S.- Nawalpur, District- West
                 Champaran

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                  Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Nawalpur P.S. Case No. 22/2026 instituted under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 3(5) of BNS lodged on 17.01.2026 by

                   the informant, Rakesh Kumar.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the petitioner took him for a walk and later other accused

                   persons accompanied him and decided to assault. The allegation

                   against this petitioner is of using knife causing injury on the

                   thigh, while Mohan Chaudhary and Pappu Chaudhary also

                   caught hold of him. He was shifted to G.M.C.H., Bettiah which

                   followed the FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34569 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                            2/4




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          allegation is of 27.12.2025, but the FIR has been lodged on

          31.12.2025 and the delay has not been recorded in it. Actually,

          the petitioner after harassing the female inmate, was trying to

          escape and fell down which resulted into the injury. The fact

          that the injury has been found to be simple in nature, supports

          the contention put forward by him.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that the

          allegation of taking him away and causing injury is attributed to

          this petitioner.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          the fact that the injury has been found to be simple in nature,

          this petitioner has no criminal antecedent, in that background,

          this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory

          bail.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event

          of his arrest or surrender before the concerned court within a

          period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each in connection with Nawalpur P.S. Case No.

          22 of 2026 to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1 st Class, Bettiah,

          West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34569 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                            3/4




          Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also the other conditions.

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card

          etc.) to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the police

          station as and when required for cooperating in the

          investigation;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his

          attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

          before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty

          to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                       (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

          promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

          failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

          cancellation of the bail bonds;

                       (vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34569 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                       4/4




                     criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/S. Prasad

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.