Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sakaldeep PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Hilsa, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Hilsa PS No.45 of 2026) involving alleged assault and theft under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant with an iron rod, causing injuries and stealing a gold chain. The petitioners contended that the dispute was minor, injuries were simple, and they had no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail, citing the seriousness of the assault allegation. Considering the nature of the injuries and the petitioners' arguments, the Court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, imposing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and several conditions regarding appearance, attendance, and non‑interference with witnesses. The order directs that the bail be released within four weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in view of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the nature of the injuries and the alleged facts justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • assault
  • bail conditions
  • Bihar
  • Hilsa case

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34620 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2026 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sakaldeep Paswan son of Baleshwar Paswan Resident of Village-
                  Brahmsthan, Beldari Tola, Police Station -Hilsa, District -Nalanda
           2.    Prem Kumar @ Prem Kishan Kumar Son of Sohray Paswan Resident of
                 Village- Brahmsthan, Beldari Tola, Police Station -Hilsa, District -Nalanda
           3.    Satya @ Satya Kumar @ Adalat Kumar son of Shree paswan Resident of
                 Village- Brahmsthan, Beldari Tola, Police Station -Hilsa, District -Nalanda

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                     Heard Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned Counsel for the

                   petitioners and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Hilsa P. S. Case No. 45 of 2026 for the offence registered

                   under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2),                      and 3(5) of

                   B.N.S..

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that while he was returning home after duty for playing on the

                   ground, dispute took place which followed the abuse/assault.

                   Allegation is that Halendra and Sakaldeep gave iron rod blow to

                   him and Gulshan causing injury and they also removed some
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34620 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                            2/3




          amount/ gold chain, the injured persons were shifted to NMCH,

          Patna which followed the FIR.

                       4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submit that a

          minor dispute has been exaggerated, injuries have been found to

          be simple in nature and they do not have criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand,

          opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that the

          allegation of assault is there.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          the fact that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature,

          in that background, this Court is inclined to grant them the

          anticipatory bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioners in the event of arrest or

          surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt

          of the order, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

          bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

          Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Hilsa (Nalanda) / Court Concerned

          Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P. S. Case No. 45 of

          2026 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of

          the Cr.P.C.

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34620 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     members/relatives of the petitioners, who shall provide official

                     document (Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Driving License, Voter ID)

                     to show his bona fide;

                                  (ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date

                     before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                     dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

                     bond by the Trial court itself;

                                  (iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned

                     police station every fortnight for next six months to mark

                     attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be

                     submitted to the Court;

                                  (iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or

                     promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                     failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                     cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                  (v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any

                     criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.