Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions, under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Sachin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case where 481.5 liters of beer were recovered from a community hall. He claimed he had no involvement, was not present at the hall, and that the investigation failed to follow the procedure under Section 103 of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The Court examined the allegations, the petitioner’s clean record, and the procedural lapse alleged. It granted anticipatory bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bail bond and two sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order was made subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged procedural lapse under Section 103 BNSS.
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to flee, tamper with evidence, or otherwise obstruct the investigation under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise offence
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 103
  • Section 482
  • bail bond
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34659 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-572 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sachin Kumar Son of Rajendra Das Resident of Vill -Gangoliya PS- Saraiya
                 Dist- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Anunay Shahi, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Muzaffarpur Excise P.S. Case No. 572 of 2026

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, total quantity of 481.5

                   liters of beer was recovered from a community hall, after it was

                   unlocked by the police officers in the presence of the local

                   Mukhiya.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner has no

                   concern with the community hall in question where alleged
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34659 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        recovery has been made. It has further been submitted that the

                        procedure prescribed under Section 103 of the BNSS has not

                        been followed. It has further been submitted that petitioner was

                        not present at the place of occurrence. It has lastly been

                        submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                        opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                        of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the

                        petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his

                        arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

                        enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

                        10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

                        amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

                        in connection with P.S. Case No. Muzaffarpur P.S. Case No. 572

                        of 2026 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                        482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

                                     7. This application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
niku/rupa/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.