Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions, finding no sufficient ground to deny bail.

Summary

Shiv Kumar Mahto was arrested in connection with the seizure of 540 litres of illicit foreign liquor from his auto, alleged to be in violation of Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. The petitioner contended that the driver escaped, no liquor was found in his possession, and the seizure was not made in compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS, arguing that he was implicated merely as the vehicle owner and has no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Court granted bail, imposing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and directing the petitioner not to engage in similar offences in the future. The bail order was directed to be executed by the Special Judge (Excise Act) in Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in offences under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act in the seizure process warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether ownership of the vehicle alone suffices to sustain the charge and affect bail considerations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • seizure procedure
  • ownership liability
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34675 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shiv Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Mahto S/O Late Ramchandra Mahto @
                 Ramsundar Mahto R/O Village- Mahuliya, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Phulparas,
                 Dist.- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through video conferencing.

                                   2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 274, 275 & 3(5) of the BNS

                   & Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                   3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   an Auto altogether 540 litres illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

                                   4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that the driver of the auto managed to

                   escape and he was not apprehended on the spot. He has further

                   submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of

                   the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34675 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police

                      personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the

                      BNSS while making seizure. Learned counsel for the petitioner

                      has further submitted that the petitioner has been framed in this

                      case only because he is the owner of the seized auto. Petitioner

                      has no criminal antecedent of similar nature and he is in judicial

                      custody since 12.03.2026.

                                      5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

                      APP for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition

                      that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature

                      of offence in future. The above named petitioner is directed to

                      be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs.

                      ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                      the satisfaction of the court of learned Special Judge (Excise

                      Act), Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Khutauna P.S.

                      Case No.194 of 2025.


                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
khushbu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.