Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Petitioner Raja Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 122 litres of illicit mahua liquor were seized from a motorcycle. He argued that he was merely the purchaser of the motorcycle, which remained owned by Gori Devi, and that no incriminating article was found on him, also contending that the procedure under Section 105 of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.) was not followed. The State opposed the bail, highlighting the petitioner's two prior similar criminal antecedents. The court examined the facts, the statutory provisions, and the petitioner's antecedents, and decided to grant anticipatory bail on the condition of furnishing bail bonds and sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. despite prior similar criminal antecedents.
  • Whether the procedural requirements of Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. were complied with in the investigation.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged connection to the seized liquor is sufficient to justify denial of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • prohibition law
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 105
  • Section 482(2)
  • prior criminal antecedents
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34715 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2025 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Raja Chaudhary S/o Mohan Choudhary R/o Village- Ketaki, P.O.- Ketaki,
                 P.S.- Deo, District - Aurangabad, Bihar

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Madhuresh Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                  The matter has been taken up today through video

                   conferencing.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               3. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 233/2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                4. As per the prosecution case, total 122 liters of illicit

                   country made mahua liquor was recovered from a jute bag

                   which was kept on a motorcycle.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case merely on the basis of being the purchaser of the seized
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34715 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                            2/3




          motorcycle. It has further been submitted that the motorcycle in

          question continues to remain in possession of its original owner,

          namely, Gori Devi and till date the same has not been

          transferred in favour of the petitioner. It has next been submitted

          that no incriminating article has been recovered from the

          possession of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that the

          procedure prescribed under Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. has not

          been followed. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner

          has got two criminal antecedents and in both of them petitioner

          is one bail.

                       6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and

          submitted that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents of

          similar nature of offence.

                       7. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his

          arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

          enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

          Aurangabad, in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 233/2025
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34715 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                        the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

                                     9. This application stands allowed.



                                                   (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.