Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Madhuri KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act.

Summary

Madhuri Kumari, a resident of Jharkhand, sold an auto‑rickshaw on 20‑05‑2024 to Raj Kumar Sao for Rs.40,000. The vehicle, later found abandoned, contained 700 litres of illicit country‑made liquor concealed in its husk, leading to a case (Kadirganj PS Case No.34 of 2025) under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed she was unaware of the liquor, had no control over the vehicle at the time of seizure, and possessed no criminal antecedents. She applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the procedure under Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act was not complied with. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the facts, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances.
  • Whether the procedural requirements of Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act were complied with.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of knowledge and control over the vehicle precludes criminal liability.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 105
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34776 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Madhuri Kumari W/o Manoj Kumar R/o Village- Dubba, P.S.- Lakay
                 Nayanpur, District- Giridih(Jharkhand)

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in

                   connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025 dated

                   30.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a), 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the allegation, altogether 700 litres of

                   country-made liquor was recovered from an auto-rickshaw

                   which was concealed inside the husk. It is alleged that the said

                   auto-rickshaw was lying in abandoned state.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that petitioner is a lady and petitioner was not aware that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 34776 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                            2/3




          said auto-rickshaw contained the consignment of illicit liquor. It

          has further been submitted that she has sold the vehicle on

          20.05.2024 to one Raj Kumar Sao on a consideration amount of

          Rs. 40,000/- and she had handed over the papers to him for

          getting the vehicle registered in his name, but the said Raj

          Kumar Sao had not got it registered. It has further been

          submitted that at the time of search and seizure, the vehicle was

          not under the control of the petitioner. It has further been

          submitted that the procedure prescribed under Section 105

          B.N.S.S has not been followed. It has further been submitted

          that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                       7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his

          arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

          enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

          Nawada, in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 34 of 2025,

          subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 34776 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     B.N.S.S.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.