Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nikhil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Nikhil Kumar, was implicated in an arms case (Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act) after a co‑accused, Mithun Kumar, made a confessional statement to police. The petitioner’s name was not originally mentioned in the FIR and he was not apprehended at the scene. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing lack of criminal antecedents, his status as a student, and that the confession of the co‑accused alone should not suffice for his arrest. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the circumstances, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000, two sureties, and a condition that the petitioner surrender within six weeks, invoking the powers under Section 482(2) of the CrPC. The application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner on the basis of a co‑accused’s confession and absence of his name in the FIR
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the CrPC are appropriate for granting anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Arms Act
  • confession of co‑accused
  • bail conditions
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 34777 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- TANDWA District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Nikhil Kumar S/O Dipak Kumar Singh Resident Of Village - Ram Nagar, P.s-
                 Tandwa, District - Aurangabad

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in

                   connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 dated

                   30.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 25 (1-B) (a), 26 of Arms Act.

                                3. As per the allegation, one pistol and one live

                   cartridges were recovered from the possession of co-accused

                   Mithun Kumar.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of

                   confessional statement of apprehended co-accused Mithun
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 34777 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Kumar before police while in police custody. It has further been

          submitted that petitioner has got enmity with the apprehended

          co-accused Mithun Kumar. It has further been submitted that

          Mithun Kumar was arrested but no name of the petitioner was

          mentioned and as such he has not been named in the F.I.R. but

          at later stage upon the confession of said apprehended Mithun

          Kumar, the name of the petitioner has transpired. It has further

          been submitted that petitioner was not apprehended at the spot.

          It has further been submitted that petitioner is a student and if he

          is sent to jail his whole life will be jeopardized. It has lastly

          been submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                       7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his

          arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

          enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

          Aurangabad in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 115 of

          2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 34777 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     the B.N.S.S.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.