Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hardev SahniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Hardev Sahni was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that 70 litres of country-made liquor were recovered from an orchard belonging to a co-accused. The petitioner contended that no incriminating article was found in his conscious possession and that he had been in custody since 24 March 2026. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, noting the absence of any seized contraband from the petitioner and the length of his pre‑trial detention, decided to grant bail. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the In‑Charge Special Judge‑I (Excise Act), Darbhanga. The Court clarified that its observations were prima facie and would not affect the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused when no incriminating article was recovered from his conscious possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition and excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • possession
  • liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • pre‑trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34877 of 2026
                      Arising out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2026 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Hardev Sahni Son of Gariban Sahni Resident of Village- Tataila, P.S.-
                 Kamtaul, Distt.- Darbhanga

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Saurav Anand, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                              2. The petitioner seeks bail in Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 19

                   of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                               3. The allegation is that 70 litres of country made

                   liquor (Mahua) was recovered near a ditch like pond inside the

                   orchard and the orchard belongs to co-accused Bhikhari Sahani.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   nothing incriminating article was recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the alleged

                   recovery was made from the orchard of co-accused Bhikhari

                   Sahani and the petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2026.

                               5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State
                Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34877 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                            2/2




           has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                     6. Considering that nothing incriminating article was

           recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and

           the petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2026, this Court is

           inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                     7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released

           on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

           thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

           the satisfaction of the learned In-Charge Special

           Judge-I (Excise Act), Darbhanga, in connection with

           Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026.

                      8. It is made clear that any observation made

           herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for

           the purpose of            adjudication of             the    present   bail

           application. Such observations shall not be construed

           as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not

           influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

           manner.



                                           (Ansul, J)
Vikash/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.