Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aslam AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, holding that the intermediate quantity does not attract the Section 37 bar.

Summary

The petitioner, Aslam Alam, was arrested in connection with an NDPS case where 53.88 grams of cannabis (smack) was seized and he was charged under Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, no prior record and that the quantity involved is intermediate, thus not attracting the bar under Section 37 of the Act. The State opposed the bail. The Court considered the quantity, the period of custody since 17‑02‑2026, and the absence of a prior record, and concluded that bail could be granted. Accordingly, the Court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Sessions Court. The Court clarified that its observations were prima facie and not to be taken as a determination on the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in an NDPS case involving an intermediate quantity of narcotic substance.
  • Whether Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which bars bail for certain quantities, is applicable in the present case.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior record and the circumstances justify regular bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • intermediate quantity
  • Section 37
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34903 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2026 Thana- NAKARDEI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Aslam Alam S/o Sahebjan Miya R/o Village - Karmaula, P.O. - Barwa, P.S. -
                 Lakhaura, Dist. - East Champaran, Bihar - 845302.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mohd Rustam Hussain, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 38 of 2026, arising out of Nakardei P.S.

                   Case No. 19 of 2026, registered under Sections 8(c), 21(b) and

                   29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

                                3. As per prosecution case, 53.88 gram of smack was

                   recovered from the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. The petitioner has no antecedent of similar cases

                   and he is in custody since 17.02.2026. In view of the fact that

                   the matter is intermediate quantity no bar under section 37

                   would be applicable in present case.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34903 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposes

                      the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the quantity and period of custody, this

                      application is allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named, be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned court of Sessions

                      Judge, Special Judge, East Champaran at Motihari/concerned

                      court below in connection with N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 38 of

                      2026, arising out of Nakardei P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                       (Ansul, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.