Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where 2 litres of foreign liquor were recovered from a scooty driven by Aditya Raj. Kumar claimed he had lent the scooty in good faith for a medical emergency and was unaware of the co‑accused's illicit intent, asserting that the vehicle was not under his control at the time of seizure. He also contended that the procedural requirements of Section 105 of the BNSS were not complied with and highlighted his clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. After hearing both sides, the court held that the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, provided he surrenders within six weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite alleged involvement in an offence under Sections 30(a)/32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure and charge complied with the procedural requirements of Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • foreign liquor
  • seizure
  • ownership
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 105 BNSS
  • Section 482(2) Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34907 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-638 Year-2025 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Gulshan Kumar Son of Ravindra Mahto @ Ravindra Kumar Resident of Badi
                 Pahadi, P.S.- Agamkuan, District- Patna
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Syed Asgher Najmi
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   20-05-2026                  The matter has been taken up today through video

                   conferencing.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Agamkuan PS Case No 638 of 2025 registered

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 30 (a)/32 of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                4. As per the allegation, 2 liters of foreign liquor was

                   recovered from a scooty and one Aditya Raj was arrested

                   driving the said scooty.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner has been made accused being the owner of the

                   seized scooty in question from which alleged recovery has been

                   made.       It has further been submitted that the petitioner had

                   given the motorcycle to Aditya Raj on good faith as he said that

                   he needed the scooty to meet some medical emergency and,

                   hence, was not aware of the evil design of the co-accused Aditya
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34907 of 2026(2) dt.20-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     Raj. It has further been submitted that no procedure prescribed

                     under Section 105 of the BNSS has been followed. It has also

                     been submitted that at the time of seizure, the scooty was not

                     under the control of the petitioner. It has lastly been submitted

                     that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.

                                  6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                  7. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                                  8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his

                     arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be

                     enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs

                     10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned,

                     Patna City, in connection with Agamkuan PS Case No 638 of

                     2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482

                     (2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

                                  9. This application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
M.E.H./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.