Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamal Kishore SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application was dismissed as withdrawn because the sole petitioner had died, rendering it infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Kamal Kishore Sah, filed an application in the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner died. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the death rendered the application infructuous and sought permission to withdraw it. The Court accepted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Justice Praveen Kumar on 9 March 2026.

Issues considered

  • Does the death of a sole petitioner render a pending application infructuous and permit its withdrawal?

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • application withdrawal
  • death of petitioner
  • infructuous
  • high court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35501 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5793 Year-2024 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                          Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Kamal Kishore Sah Son of Late Saryug Prasad Resident of Ritu Kunj, Pal
                 Lane, Govind Mitra Road P.S -Pirbahore, Dist- Patna

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Satish Prasad Son of Ram Pratap Mahto village- Adarsh colony, B H
                 Colony, Bhootnath, Kankarbagh, Po- TV Tower, Ps- Agamkuan, Dist- Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Anuj Dilbar Krishna, Advocate
                 For the Respondent-State:      Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-03-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   sole petitioner has died during pendency of this application,

                   therefore this application has become infructuous and as such,

                   he seeks permission to withdraw the present application.

                               3. Permission is accorded.

                               4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as

                   withdrawn having been infructuous.



                                             (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.