Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj Parit @ Manoj PanditversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Manoj Parit was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act where 18.250 kg of ganja was seized. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, that the quantity was below commercial level, he had no prior criminal record, and he is a handicapped person earning a livelihood by selling utensils. The State opposed the bail. The court, noting the sub‑commercial quantity, lack of antecedents, and the petitioner’s personal circumstances, granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The order was made on a prima facie basis and does not prejudice the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case where the seized quantity is below commercial threshold and the accused has no prior record.
  • Whether the petitioner’s handicap and livelihood considerations warrant the grant of bail.
  • Whether the prosecution’s evidence is sufficient to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • commercial quantity
  • handicapped
  • first-time offender
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35516 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- SAHODARA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Parit @ Manoj Pandit S/o Bhagat Parit @ Bhagat Pandit R/o - Siswa
                 Tajpur, P.S - Bhangaha, District - West Champaran
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan,APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Sahodara P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026, registered under Sections 8,

                   20(b) (ii) (c), 23(c), 25 and 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, the allegation is that the

                   18.250 kg of ganja was recovered from the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. Learned counsel further submits that the quantity

                   is below commercial and the petitioner bears no criminal

                   antecedent. Petitioner is a handicapped person and he used to

                   earn his livelihood by selling utensils in an auto. The real

                   offender managed to escape and the petitioner was caught with

                   auto. The petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2026.

                                5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposes
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35516 of 2026(2) dt.25-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the fact that recovered ganja is below

                      commercial quantity and absence of criminal antecedent as well

                      as period of custody, this bail application is allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named, be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                      Judge NDPS, Bettiah, West Champaran/concerned court below

                      in connection with Sahodara P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                       (Ansul, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.