Patna High Court
Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that bail may be granted as the seized liquor was not linked to the petitioner and no material was recovered from him, subject to statutory conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a seizure of 28.35 litres of foreign liquor from a Scorpio vehicle under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that he neither owned nor drove the vehicle and that the liquor recovered did not belong to him, asserting that his name appeared only due to a co-accused's confessional statement. The State opposed bail, citing his prior similar offence. The court observed that the liquor was seized from a vehicle not owned by the petitioner, nothing was recovered from him, and while he has a criminal antecedent, the evidence did not directly link him to the contraband. Consequently, the court granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., including verification of his antecedent.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite a prior similar offence.
- Whether the seizure of liquor from a vehicle not owned by the petitioner establishes sufficient grounds for continued detention.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- bail
- anticipatory bail
- foreign liquor
- seizure
- vehicle ownership
- criminal antecedent
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35535 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2026 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna
======================================================
Sonu Kumar Son of Rupchand Chaudhary Resident of Village- Taregnadih,
P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 21-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with
Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 149 of 2026, for allegedly having committed
offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
(Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution story which has been lodged on
the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to the effect
that he got information that the petitioner and three other persons
have brought foreign liquor in a black Scorpio having Registration
No. BR01JA-9234 and which is standing on the Block Road. To
verify the same, the informant along with the police party reached
there and two persons were apprehended, while they were unloading
the foreign liquor. Upon seeing the police party, two other persons
fled away. From the Scorpio, 28.35 liters of foreign liquor was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35535 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
2/3
recovered, for which a seizure list was also prepared.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any
offence. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the
vehicle and the illicit liquor which has been recovered from the
Scorpio does not belongs to the petitioner. He further submits that the
name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case only on the
basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, who were
taken into custody at the time of raid. He further submits that the
petitioner is also an accused in Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025
under the Excise Act.
5. Per contra, the learned APP for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has got
an antecedent of similar nature and there is every chance that if he
will be granted anticipatory bail, he will again indulge in the same
activity.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
after going through the records, it appears that the alleged liquor has
been seized from a vehicle, which does not belong to the petitioner.
The petitioner was not arrested at the place of the occurrence and
nothing has been recovered from him. The petitioner has got one
criminal antecedent of similar nature.
7. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above
named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35535 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
3/3
weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in
connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 149 of 2026, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with a
further condition that :-
The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that
the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court
concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the
petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the
above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the
name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
priyanka/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.