Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satish Kumar @ Satish ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioners, Satish Kumar and Akash Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case (Bairiya PS Case No.278 of 2025) alleging they assaulted an informant and his brother with a farsa, leading to simple injuries. They argued they were innocent, the FIR was delayed by 25 days, and the dispute stemmed from longstanding neighbour enmity. The State opposed bail, contending the assault caused injuries. The High Court noted the medical report described the injuries as simple, the petitioners had a clean antecedent, and the FIR delay was unexplained, but found no compelling reason to deny bail. Consequently, the Court granted bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and verification of criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the FIR alleging assault
  • Whether the 25‑day delay in filing the FIR is a ground to deny bail
  • Whether the nature of injuries (simple) affects the bail decision
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent warrants bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • FIR delay
  • simple injuries
  • clean antecedent
  • CrPC Section 482
  • Bihar Penal Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35541 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Satish Kumar @ Satish Choudhary S/o Harendra Choudhary @ Harendra
                  Chaudhari R/o Village - Nautan Road Near Vikash Bhawan, Bagahi
                  Ratanpur, Police Station- Bairiya, District - West Champaran
           2.     Akash Kumar @ Aakas Choudhary S/o Ramchandra Choudhary R/o Village
                  - Nautan Road Near Vikash Bhawan, Bagahi Ratanpur, Police Station-
                  Bairiya, District - West Champaran
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   learned APP for the state.

                                  2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Bairiya P. S. Case No. 278 of 2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Section 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109,

                   74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of BNS.

                                 3. As per the prosecution story which has been lodged on

                   the basis of the written report submitted by the informant to the effect

                   that a game of Madari was going on in the village and all of a

                   sudden, the accused persons came there along with the petitioners

                   and assaulted the younger brother of the informant. The specific

                   allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he assaulted the informant on

                   his head with a farsa. The allegation against the petitioner no.2 is of

                   assaulting the younger brother of the informant with farsa due to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35541 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                            2/3




          which he sustained injuries on his head.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. He

          further submits that both the parties are next door neighbors and there

          is a dispute in between the parties from before and due to village

          politics, the name of the petitioners have been taken in the present

          case. He submits that the injuries sustained by both the injured,

          including the informant are simple in nature and the present case has

          been lodged only due to previous enmity. He further submits that the

          occurrence is of 25.06.2025, however, the First Information Report

          has been lodged on 10.07.2025 and no explanation for the delay of

          25 days has been given in the First Information Report.

                        5. Per contra, the learned APP for the State opposes the

          prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that both the petitioners

          assaulted the informant and his brother on their head due to which

          they suffered injuries.

                       6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the

          learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, it

          appears that the allegation of assault is there against both the

          petitioners. However, the learned Additional District and Session

          Judge-V, Bettiah at West Champaran while rejecting the anticipatory

          bail petition of the petitioners, in paragraph no.6, has discussed about

          the injuries received by both the injured persons and has recorded

          that the doctor has opined the injuries to be simple in nature. Further,
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35541 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       the petitioners have got a clean antecedent.

                                    7. Considering the above, let the petitioners, above named,

                       in the even of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks,

                       be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                       Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran

                       in connection with the Bairiya P.S. Case No. 278 of 2025, subject of

                       the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS., with a

                       further condition that :

                                        The learned Court concerned shall verify the criminal

                       antecedents of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that

                       the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court

                       concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

                       petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the

                       above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the

                       name of verification.



                                                   (Ritesh Kumar, J)
priyanka/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.