Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunny Kumar GillversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioners are entitled to bail in the present case.

Summary

The petitioners, Sunny Kumar Gill (co‑driver) and Md. Ekbal (driver), were arrested in connection with the seizure of 4,651.80 litres of foreign liquor and 500 cartons of mustard oil from a truck. They were charged under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 30(a), 32(1), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2022. The petitioners contended that they had no knowledge of the illicit liquor, had no prior criminal record, and that the seizure violated mandatory procedural requirements. The State opposed bail. Considering the alleged procedural lapse in the seizure and the petitioners' clean antecedent, the Court ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act and BNS.
  • Whether the alleged violation of mandatory provisions of search and seizure warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' lack of knowledge and clean criminal record justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • search and seizure
  • procedural violation
  • foreign liquor
  • prohibition law
  • excise law
  • driver
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35814 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2026 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sunny Kumar Gill Son of Nasib Chand Resident of Village- Talwandi
                  Bharo, P.S.- Nakodar, District- Jalandhar, State- Punjab
           2.     Md. Ekbal @ Mo. Ikbal Son of Late Md. Mokhtar Resident of Village-
                  Unnaonagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Unnao, State- Uttarpradesh
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-06-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State, through virtual mode.

                                2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the

                   petitioners in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 200 of

                   2026, registered under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS and

                   30(a), 32(1), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that 4651.80 litres of

                   Indian made Foreign Liquor and also 500 cartons of mustard oil

                   was recovered from the truck bearing Registration No.

                   UP78CN5259.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that

                   petitioner no. 1 is the co-driver while petitioner no.2 is the

                   driver of the said truck. They have no knowledge that illicit
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35814 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        liquor was carried in the said truck. There is no independent

                        witness to the seizure list indicating violation of mandatory

                        provisions of search and seizure. The petitioners have no

                        criminal antecedent and they are in custody since 19.03.2026.

                                     5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                        for the State.

                                     6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and

                        circumstances of the case and also considering the violation of

                        mandatory provisions of sizure and that they have no criminal

                        antecedent, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in

                        connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 200 of 2026, on

                        furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

                        two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                        learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor

                        Court.


                                                  (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Harsh/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.