Patna High Court
Sunaina KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that the petitioner, not being named in the FIR and having a clean antecedent, is entitled to anticipatory bail subject to the stipulated conditions.
Summary
Sunaina Kumari, the owner of a motorcycle from which 20 litres of country-made liquor was seized, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting she was not named in the FIR and had no involvement in the alleged offence. The State opposed the bail, alleging her participation in liquor selling. The court noted that her name appeared only because she owned the seized vehicle, and she has a clean antecedent and is a woman. Considering these facts, the court granted anticipatory bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to verification of her criminal antecedent and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the CrPC in the context of alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
- Whether ownership of the seized motorcycle suffices to implicate the petitioner in the offence.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482 CrPC
- liquor seizure
- ownership of vehicle
- clean antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35820 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2026 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada
======================================================
Sunaina Kumari D/o Ram Bali Rajvanshi R/o Village - Sri Rampur, P.S -
Hisua, District - Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 26-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection
with Narhat P.S. Case No. 85 of 2026, for allegedly having
committed offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been lodged
on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant, to the
effect that the police received an information that one Apache
motorcycle along with the pillion rider is coming with country
made liquor from Pathraul. To verify the authenticity of the said
information, the informant along with the police personnel reached
village Hasanpur and found that one blue colour motorcycle is
coming. Upon seeing the police party, the person riding the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35820 of 2026(2) dt.26-05-2026
2/3
motorcycle fled away, after leaving the same. Upon search, 20
litres of country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle
bearing Registration No.BR27T-5463 and accordingly, the seizure
list was prepared.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. He
submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the aforesaid
occurrence and has falsely been implicated in this case. The liquor,
which has been seized by the police, was recovered near the house
of Santosh Rajvanshi and the petitioner has got no concern with
the alleged seizure. He further submits that the name of the
petitioner transpired in the present case, since she is the owner of
the seized motorcycle. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a
lady and has got a clean antecedent.
5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the
petitioner and submits that the petitioner does not deserve the
privilege of anticipatory bail, since she was found indulged in
selling country made liquor.
6. Having considered the rival submissions and after
going through the records, it appears that the petitioner was not
named in the F.I.R. Her name transpired in the present case only
on the basis of the fact that she is owner of the alleged seized
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35820 of 2026(2) dt.26-05-2026
3/3
motorcycle from which 20 litres of country made liquor was
recovered. Further, the petitioner has got a clean antecedent and
she is a lady.
7. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the
petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender
within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive
Special Court, Excise-1, Nawada in connection with Narhat P.S.
Case No.85 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under
Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S with a further condition that:-
The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that
the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedent, the court
concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the
petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the
above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in
the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.