Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

OM PRAKASH CHOUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that despite alleged procedural lapses, the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the small quantity of narcotics not in his personal possession justify granting bail.

Summary

Om Prakash Choudhary was arrested under Sections 8(c), 21(a), 21(b) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act after a seizure of 118 pieces of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus, 4 pieces of Wiscodin Syrup and 0.67 gram of brown sugar from his house. The petitioner contended that the search was conducted without an independent witness, violating search‑seizure provisions, and that the charge‑sheet was filed without the forensic laboratory report. He also highlighted his clean criminal record and that he had been in custody since 7 November 2025. The State opposed bail. The court, noting the very small quantity of narcotic, the lack of personal possession, the petitioner’s clean antecedent and that the charge‑sheet was already filed, held that the procedural lapses were not fatal and ordered bail. Accordingly, bail was granted on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the alleged violation of search and seizure provisions affects the grant of bail under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the absence of a forensic laboratory report in the charge‑sheet is a fatal defect for bail considerations.
  • Whether the small quantity of narcotic substances recovered justifies bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent warrants the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • search and seizure
  • procedural lapse
  • small quantity
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35992 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- Bhimnagar District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 OM PRAKASH CHOUDHARY S/o Laxman Choudhri @ Lakshman
                 Choudhary Resident of village- Bhimnagar ward no 11, Ps- Bhimnagar,
                 District- Supaul
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sujeet Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Shantanu Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 8(c), 21(a), 21(b) and 22(b)

                   of the N.D.P.S Act.

                                3. As per FIR, 118 pieces of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus, 4

                   pieces of Wiscodin Syrup and 0.67 gram of Brown Sugar has

                   been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   from the House of the petitioner, a recovery of 118 pieces of

                   Spasmo Proxyvon Plus medicine and 4 pieces of Wiscodin

                   Syrup and 0.67 grams of Brown Sugar is shown to have been

                   recovered. However, the said recovery has not been made in

                   presence of any independent witness as such, the mandatory
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35992 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                                         2/2




                       provisions of search and seizure have been violated. It is further

                       submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case

                       without the FSL report and the petitioner with no criminal

                       antecedent is languishing in custody since 7.11.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the

                       application for bail.

                                    6.    Taking      into     consideration   the   facts   and

                       circumstances and also considering the fact of recovery of small

                       quantity of brown sugar that too not from his personal or

                       conscious possession coupled with the fact that the petitioner

                       has clean antecedent and charge-sheet has already been

                       submitted, let the above named petitioner, who has no criminal

                       antecedent, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

                       Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                       amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

                       the case is pending/successor court in connection with N.D.P.S.

                       Case No. 119/2025.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.