Patna High Court
Marai BindversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioners, finding procedural irregularities and no antecedent sufficient to justify release.
Summary
The petitioners, Marai Bind and Lalan Choudhary, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 6.36 litres of country-made liquor was seized from a boat they were operating. They contended that they had no knowledge of the liquor, were not in physical possession, and that the search and seizure were procedurally defective because no independent witness was recorded. The State opposed bail, arguing the offence was established. The Court examined the alleged procedural lapses, the petitioners' clean criminal record, and their continued custody since 23‑02‑2026, and concluded that the irregularities justified granting bail. Accordingly, the Court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, pending further proceedings.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged violation of search and seizure procedures warrants granting bail.
- Whether the petitioners were in possession of the seized liquor.
- Whether the petitioners' lack of criminal antecedent justifies bail despite the charge under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- search and seizure
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- liquor seizure
- procedural violation
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36085 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- Khawaspur District- Bhojpur
======================================================
1. Marai Bind S/o Late Bhoda Bind R/o vill - Khawaspur, P.s.- Krishnagarh,
Distt.- Bhojpur
2. Lalan Choudhary S/o Ghural Bind R/o vill - Khawaspur, P.s.- Krishnagarh,
Distt.- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niraj Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Devi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for
the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Perusal of the first information report and the
seizure list, would go to show that 6.36 liters of country made
liquor is said to have been recovered which was being carried
on a Dengi (boat) to be delivered at a particular village.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioners that there is no recovery from the physical and
conscious possession of the petitioners. It is submitted that the
petitioner was involved in local transpiration on ferry and he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36085 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
2/2
had no clue about the consignment being that of liquor. It is
further submitted that the mandatory provisions of search and
seizure have been violated as there is no independent witness to
the seizure list and the petitioners with no criminal antecedent
are languishing in judicial custody since 23.02.2026 and the
charge sheet has already been submitted.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances and also considering the fact that there is
violation in the process of search and seizure coupled with the
fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the
above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in
connection with Khwaspur P.S. Case 10 of 2026.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.