Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kavita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner, subject to a bail bond and verification conditions under the BNSS, 2023.

Summary

Kavita Devi applied for anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 21 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a hut belonging to her, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner contended she was not present at the site, had no criminal antecedent, and the recovery was not from her conscious possession. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence despite the petitioner’s clean record. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted anticipatory bail on the condition of furnishing a Rs.30,000 bond under Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 and compliance with Section 482(2) of the same Act. The order also directed the trial court to verify the petitioner’s antecedent and cancel the bail if concealment is discovered. The bail bond is to be accepted without delay for verification purposes.

Issues considered

  • The applicability of anticipatory bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 to the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement and alleged possession of illicit liquor justify denial of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether conditions imposed under the BNSS, 2023 are appropriate for granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • BNSS 2023
  • criminal antecedent
  • illicit liquor
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36121 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2026 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Kavita Devi Wife of Harendra Paswan Resident of Village- Mandai Dih @
                 Marie Dih @ Manddai Dih, P.S.- Patepur, District- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Anuj Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-06-2026                  The Court proceeding is being conducted through

                   virtual mode.

                                2. Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                   Learned A.P.P for the State.

                                3. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Patepur P.S. Case No.114 of 2026, for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                4. As per the prosecution, the total recovery of 21

                   litres of Chulai liquor have been alleged to be made from a hut,

                   which is the subject matter of the present case.

                                5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   also submits that petitioner was not present on the spot and her
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36121 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
                                            2/3




          name has been transpired only at the instance of her local

          enemy. Counsel further submits that criminal antecedent of the

          petitioner is clean. He further submits that the alleged recovery

          has not been made from conscious possession of the petitioner.

          He further submits that only 6 litres of wine has been recovered

          from a hut, which belongs to the petitioner

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner and submits that criminal antecedent of the

          petitioner is clean.

                       7. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand)

          as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the

          satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Prohibition Court-2-

          cum- Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in

          connection with Patepur P.S. Case No.114 of 2026, subject to

          the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023

                       And further condition that the Trial Court shall verify

          the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage

          it is found that the petitioner has concealed her criminal
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36121 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     antecedent, the Trial Court shall take step for cancellation of

                     bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail

                     bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be

                     delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.



                                                              (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.