Patna High Court
Nagendra Mandal @ Nage MandalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Summary
The petitioner, Nagendra Mandal, applied for bail in connection with FIR No.245/2023 alleging offences under several IPC sections, including assault and outraging modesty. He contended that the FIR only recorded his exhortation and no overt act, and that the investigating agency’s final report cleared him of involvement. The State opposed bail, highlighting three prior criminal antecedents and alleging that the petitioner acted as an order‑giver in the alleged assault. The learned Judicial Magistrate, despite the final report, had taken cognizance of the offences and ordered the petitioner to surrender. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and subject to Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner, who is alleged only to have exhorted the co‑accused, can be granted bail despite the magistrate’s cognizance of the offences.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code — s. 307, 323, 324, 34, 341, 354B, 379, 504, 506
Subjects
- bail
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Indian Penal Code
- exhortation
- prior criminal antecedents
- surety
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36265 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2023 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani
======================================================
Nagendra Mandal @ Nage Mandal, S/o Gangay Mandal, R/o Village - Jaso,
P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 02-06-2026 Heard Mr. A.K. Thakur, learned Advocate for the
petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Basopatti P.S. Case No.245 of 2023 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354B, 379, 324,
307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, on the exhortation made by this
petitioner on the given date and time of occurrence, co-accused
Brahamadeo Thakur brutally assaulted the informant by means
of a spade on his head, due to which he sustained serious injury.
There is further allegation against co-accused Ranjeet Thakur of
causing assault to the informant by means of a bamboo stick.
Besides, there is allegation of outraging the modesty of the wife
of the informant and snatching of valuables by other co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36265 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
2/3
persons.
4. The learned Advocate for the petitioner, taking this
Court through the FIR, contended that save and except the
allegation of exhortation, there is no allegation of any overt act
against the petitioner. In fact, there was a dispute between the
families which resulted into a free fight, leading to some
unfortunate injuries and institution of case and counter-case
being Basopatti P.S. Case No. 246 of 2023, instituted by the
wife of the co-accused against the informant and his family
members. During the course of investigation, no materials have
been collected against the petitioner and accordingly a final
report has been submitted showing the petitioner as innocent
and he has not even been sent up for trial. A copy of the final
report has been placed on record as Annexure-2. However, differing
with the final report, the learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st Class,
Madhubani, has taken cognizance of the offences as alleged in the
FIR. Hence, the necessity of the present application.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the
petitioner is carrying three criminal antecedents, as disclosed in
para-3 of the bail application and there is a specific accusation
against the petitioner that he is an order giver.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36265 of 2026(2) dt.02-06-2026
3/3
6. Having considered the submissions advanced on
behalf of learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking
note of the nature of accusation, coupled with the fact that the
petitioner was not sent up for trial and differing with the final
report, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance for the
offences as alleged in the FIR, besides the factum of case and
counter-case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail,
in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court
below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti
P.S. Case No.245 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down
under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that
one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the
petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.