Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naresh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions.

Summary

Naresh Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 274 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered, including 88 litres from the rear of his house while he was absent. The petitioner asserted his innocence, a clean criminal record, and willingness to comply with any conditions. The State opposed bail but conceded that the liquor was recovered from an open place and the petitioner had no prior record. The Court, considering these facts, granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 30,000 and imposing conditions including verification of his antecedent by the trial court. The order also stipulated that bail could be cancelled if the petitioner concealed any criminal antecedent.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in a case of alleged possession of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the recovery of liquor from an open place and the petitioner's clean antecedent justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • BNSS 2023
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • bail bond
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36478 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-601 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Naresh Manjhi S/o Chandar Manjhi @ Ramchandra Manjhi Resident of
                 village- Mushahari Tola (Koila Belwa), PS - Chakia, District - East
                 Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-06-2026                  The Court proceeding is being conducted through

                   virtual mode.

                                2.    Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                   Learned APP for the State.

                                3. The present criminal miscellaneous application has

                   been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                   Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS, 2023’) for

                   grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest

                   in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 601 of 2025, lodged on

                   03.12.2025, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                4. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   four named accused persons including the present petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36478 of 2026(2) dt.04-06-2026
                                            2/3




          Total recovery of 274 litres of country made liquor has been

          made which is the subject matter of the present case.

                       5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

          submits that out of total 274 litres of country made liquor, 88

          litres of country made liquor was recovered from the backside

          of the house (Osara) of the petitioner, which is an open place.

          He submits that at the time of recovery, he was not present in his

          house. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the

          petitioner is clean. Counsel further submits that petitioner is

          ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed

          upon him.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that as per the pleading

          recovery has been made from an open place and antecedent of

          the petitioner is clean.

                       7. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand)

          as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36478 of 2026(2) dt.04-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-03, East

                     Champaran, Motihar, in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No.

                     601/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of

                     the BNSS, 2023.

                                  8. And further condition that the Trial Court shall

                     verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the Trial Court shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.              However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.

                                                                   (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./Bipin/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.