Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tetri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail, holding that the recovery of illicit liquor was not made from the petitioner's conscious physical possession and that she is entitled to bail under the applicable provisions.

Summary

Tetri Devi, the wife of a deceased man, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 72.6 litres of Nepali liquor were recovered from a hut purportedly belonging to her. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in her conscious physical possession, that the hut was occupied by other adult family members, and that she has a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed her request for anticipatory bail. The court examined whether the recovery satisfied the mandatory provisions of Section 105 of the BNSS and considered the relevance of Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Finding that the recovery did not prima facie indicate her possession and noting her clean record, the court directed that she be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the stipulated conditions. The order effectively granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC in view of the alleged recovery of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the recovery of liquor was made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, thereby attracting liability under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 105 of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • possession
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 105 BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36503 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2026 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East
                                                        Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Tetri Devi, Wife of Late Khobari Paswan, Resident of Village-Gurhanwa
                 Bazar, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                    apprehending her arrest in connection with Kundwa

                    Chainpur P.S. Case No.84 of 2026 registered under Section

                    30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                    illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                    recovery of 72.6 liters of Nepali liquor from the bag.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                    petitioner that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made

                    from a hut, which is alleged to be belonged to this

                    petitioner. It is pointed out that merely on the basis of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36503 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                            2/3




          suspicion raised by local choukidar, the petitioner was

          implicated with present recovery. It is also pointed out that

          the recovery was shown to be made from the house of this

          petitioner, where the process of recovery of illicit liquor

          prima facie not suggest that the mandatory legal provisions

          of Section 105 of the BNSS complied with. The house in

          issue also occupied by different adult family members and,

          therefore, recovery cannot be said to be made from

          conscious physical possession of this petitioner. The

          petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from conscious physical possession

          of this petitioner, who is a lady of clean antecedent,

          accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her

          arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four

          weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36503 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                      of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-3, I/c Civil

                      Court, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with

                      Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No.84 of 2026, subject to the

                      conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.