Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

UPENDRA CHAUDHARYversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the recovery of liquor did not prima facie show conscious physical possession by the petitioner, and therefore granted anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Upendra Chaudhary, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 15 litres of liquor recovered from a field belonging to him. The petitioner contended that the field was an open, public area and that the recovery did not demonstrate his conscious physical possession of the liquor. He applied for anticipatory bail, while the Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the relief. The Court examined the factual submissions and held that the recovery, on a prima facie basis, did not establish conscious possession by the petitioner. Consequently, the Court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from an open field constitutes conscious physical possession of the petitioner for the purpose of denying anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC in view of the allegations under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36552 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2026 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI District-
                                                       Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Upendra Chaudhary, S/o Rameshwar Chaudhary, Resident of Village-
                 Pahariya, P.S.-Shekhopur Sarai, District - Sheikhpura
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mrs. Asha Devi, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                    apprehending his arrest in connection with Shekhopur P.S.

                    Case No.75 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the

                    Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                    illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                    recovery of 15 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                    the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                    made from boring site of the field, which belongs to the

                    petitioner. It is submitted that as the place was open, it was
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36552 of 2026(2) dt.08-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      accessible by general public and, therefore, the recovery of

                      illicit liquor cannot be said to be made from conscious physical

                      possession of this petitioner. It is pointed out that petitioner

                      found involved in two more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

                                   5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

                      bail to the petitioner.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

                      taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not

                      appears to be made from conscious physical possession of this

                      petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

                      event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

                      period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on

                      bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court,

                      Sheikhpura in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case

                      No.75 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                      Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the

                      BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.