Ravin Yadav @ Ravin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36611 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2026 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Ravin Yadav @ Ravin Kumar S/o Parsuram Yadav @ Shyam Vihari Yadav
                 Resident Of Village -Gangiya, Po- Tetarabad, Ps- Gangaur. Dist- Khagaria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar BIhar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jai Kishor Poddar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-06-2026                    Heard Mr. Jai Kishor Poddar, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned APP for

                   the State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   28.01.2026, in connection with Khagaria (Gangaur) P.S. Case

                   No. 26 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 19.01.2026                   registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4),

                   352, 351(2) & (3) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he while

                   firing pistol threatened to kill the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the

                   present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in

                   the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36611 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026
                                            2/3




          committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. From perusal of

          the F.I.R. it appears that due to some land dispute the present

          occurrence had taken place and both the parties are agnates to

          each other and there is case and counter case between the

          parties.     Further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it

          appears that there is specific allegation of firing is attributed

          against co-accused persons, namely, Chitranjan Yadav, Nitish

          Kjumar and Shyam Bihari Yadav and as per allegation against

          the petitioner that he has fired in the air. He further submits that

          the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the

          petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026.

                       5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for            bail of the

          petitioner and submits that the petitioner has participated in the

          present crime in question and apart from aforesaid the petitioner

          carries one more case other than the present one.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with

          Khagaria (Gangaur) P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026, subject to the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36611 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         following conditions :-

                                      (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T