Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Moe Than TarversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GAYA

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may withdraw the application and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Moe Than Tar filed a petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and the Economic Offences Unit. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court considered whether a party may be allowed to withdraw a petition at its own discretion. After hearing the counsel, the Court found no impediment to the withdrawal and granted the request. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending petition/application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • court discretion
  • civil procedure
  • customs
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3667 of 2024
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                           Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Moe Than Tar D/o Thaung Khein Mohalla- 68b, Mya Kan Thar Street, 10
                  Mile Insein Township, Yangoon, Myanmar (BURMA)

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
            1.    The Union of India Through Assistant Commissioner Of Customs,
                  International Airport Gaya, Bihar
            2.    The Economic Offences Unit Through S.P. Economic Offences, Patna,
                  Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh (Asg)
                  For the Custom           :       Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC Custom
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    20-01-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

                    withdraw this application.

                                 2. Permission is accorded.

                                 3. As prayed for, the petition stands dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.