Patna High Court
Uttam Chaudhary @ Uttam Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted as the seizure was not from the petitioner's conscious possession and there was no breach of Section 103 BNSS, subject to prescribed conditions.
Summary
Uttam Chaudhary was arrested on 29 April 2026 for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act after police recovered 29.280 litres of illicit foreign liquor from bushes behind his house. The petitioner contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that the prosecution had failed to comply with mandatory provisions of Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023. The State highlighted the petitioner’s six prior criminal cases, though he was on bail in those matters. The High Court examined the facts, the nature of the seizure, and the procedural allegations, and concluded that the circumstances did not warrant continued detention. Accordingly, the Court ordered his release on bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act where the seized liquor was not in his conscious possession.
- Whether non‑compliance with Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023, affects the grant of bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s antecedent criminal cases justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act — s. 30(a)
- Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023 — s. 103
Subjects
- bail
- excise law
- illicit liquor
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act
- Section 103
- BNSS Act
- criminal antecedent
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36724 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2026 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
======================================================
Uttam Chaudhary @ Uttam Kumar Chaudhary Son of Uma Shankar
Chaudhary Resident of Village - Pojhia, P.S. - Kopa, District - Saran at
Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 15-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
29.04.2026 in connection with Kopa P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026
for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Excise and Prohibition Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on
22.02.2026, the police got secret information that illicit liquor is
kept in the bushes behind the house of Uttam Kumar. On the
said information, the police reached near the house of Uttam
Kumar where on seeing the police jeep, one person fled away
from the spot. Upon inquiry, the local villagers disclosed the
name of fled person as Uttam Kumar (petitioner here). On
searching, the police recovered total 29.280 litres illicit foreign
liquor from the bushes behind the house of this petitioner.
Thereafter, police seized the illicit liquor and prepared seizure
list in presence of two witnesses from raiding party.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36724 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026
2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the
present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it
appears from the FIR and seizure list that nothing has been
recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather
the recovery has been made from the bush behind the house of
the petitioner. It is next submitted that there is non-compliance
of mandatory provisions of Section 103 of BNSS, 2023 and
petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that petitioner has antecedent of six cases other than the
present case but fairly submits that petitioner is on bail in the
pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3 rd
Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra in connection
with Kopa P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026, subject to the following
conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36724 of 2026(2) dt.15-06-2026
3/3
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.