Patna High Court
Baleshwar SahniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted as the petitioner’s alleged involvement rests only on co‑accused testimony, no firearm was recovered from him, and the investigation is concluded, removing the risk of evidence tampering.
Summary
Baleshwar Sahni was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged conspiracy and possession of a firearm, charged under several IPC sections and the Arms Act. He has been in custody since September 2025, and his alleged involvement is based solely on a co-accused's statement, with no weapon recovered from him. The petitioner argued that the investigation is complete, a charge‑sheet has been filed, and there is no risk of evidence tampering. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s prior criminal history. The court noted the lack of physical possession of a firearm, the reliance on co‑accused testimony, and the concluded investigation, and consequently ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) CrPC and Section 480(3) BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted when the accusation is based solely on a co‑accused's disclosure and no firearm is recovered from the petitioner.
- Whether the completion of investigation and filing of a charge‑sheet eliminates the risk of evidence tampering, justifying bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents affect the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1-b)a, 26, 35
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 480(3)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 437(3)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120(B), 412, 413, 414, 467, 468
Subjects
- bail
- Indian Penal Code
- Arms Act
- co‑accused testimony
- evidence tampering
- charge‑sheet
- BNSS
- Section 437(3) CrPC
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3682 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2021 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East
Champaran
======================================================
Baleshwar Sahni son of Late Rama Sahani Resident of Village- Akauna, P.S.-
Chiraiya, District-East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate
Mr.Sumit Kumar, Advocate
Mr.Sudhanshu Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection
with Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No. 318 of 2021 registered
for the offences under Sections 412, 413, 414, 467, 468,
120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26,
35 of the Arms Act.
3. The accused/petitioner is named in the First
Information Report and is in custody since 19.09.2025.
4. As per FIR, upon secret information, as some
persons were assembled to plan some crime, police raided the
spot and apprehended number of accused persons, who found
in possession of country made pistol and some live cartridges.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3682 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
2/3
5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the petitioner that name of the petitioner transpired
on the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused
persons namely, Hariom Sahani, in furtherance of which no
incriminating material appears recovered from possession of
this petitioner as he was not apprehended on the spot. It is
pointed out that Hariom Sahani has already been granted bail
by one of the learned coordinate Bench of this Court vide
order dated 25.05.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 71419 of
2021. It is also submitted that one of the reasons behind false
implication is the suspicion arising out of criminal antecedents
of the petitioner as he found involved in total eleven (11)
cases, where he is on bail in all the cases.
6. While concluding argument, it is submitted that
investigation of this case is already concluded, for which
charge-sheet has been submitted and as such, there is no
chance of tampering with the evidence.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the
prayer for bail of the petitioner.
8. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3682 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
3/3
taking note of the fact as admittedly no fire-arm appears to be
recovered from conscious physical possession of this
petitioner, where implication appears merely on the basis of
suspicion arising out of disclosure made by apprehended co-
accused, coupled with the fact that investigation of this case is
already concluded, where petitioner remains in custody since
19.09.2025, accordingly, above-named petitioner is directed
to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari/concerned court, in
connection with Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No. 318 of 2021,
subject to the condition as laid down under Section 437(3)
Cr.P.C/Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.