Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suresh Kumar Gupta @ Suresh Prasad GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the recovery of illicit liquor was not made from the petitioner's conscious physical possession, and therefore granted anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar Gupta, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with a seizure of 1,235 litres of IMFL/country‑made liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. He contended that he was implicated only because he owned the truck used to transport the liquor and that he had no conscious possession or knowledge of the contraband. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The Court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not appear to be from the petitioner's conscious physical possession. Considering his clean antecedent and the lack of direct involvement, the Court directed that he be released on anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. A bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount was ordered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner had conscious physical possession of the seized illicit liquor.
  • Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC is appropriate in the present facts.
  • Whether ownership of the vehicle used for transport suffices to implicate the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • illegal liquor
  • anticipatory bail
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • CrPC Section 438
  • vehicle ownership liability

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36832 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2026 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Suresh Kumar Gupta @ Suresh Prasad Gupta, S/o Bhagwat Sah @ Bagwat
                 Saw @ Bhajwat Prasad Singh, R/o Village - Agarwar, P.S. - Motihari, Dist. -
                 East Champaran (Motihari). At present - Domcach Near LIC Building
                 Koderma, P.S. - Domcach, Dist. - Koderma (Jharkhand).
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Piprakothi P.S.

                   Case No.91 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 1235 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated with

                   present recovery of illicit liquor only for the reason that he is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36832 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          owner of the truck, which alleged to be involved in carrying

          consignment of illicit liquor. It is submitted that nothing

          transpired during investigation, which may suggest that

          petitioner was under knowledge and moreover recovery was

          not made from conscious physical possession of this

          petitioner. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from conscious physical possession

          of this petitioner, where implication of this petitioner appears

          being owner of the vehicle alleged to be involved in carrying

          consignment of illicit liquor, accordingly, the petitioner,

          above-named,          who is a man of clean antecedent, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court of Exclusive Special Excise
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36832 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Judge-I, East Champaran (Motihari)/concerned Court in

                     connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No.91 of 2026, subject

                     to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                     CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                          (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.