Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul Paswan @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners.

Summary

Petitioners Rahul Paswan and Sonu Kumar, the driver and co‑driver of a pick‑up van, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 1,512 litres of foreign liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. They contended that the liquor was not recovered from their possession, they were unaware of the consignment, and they have no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 30‑03‑2026. The State opposed their bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offence. After hearing both sides, the High Court considered the lack of direct possession, the petitioners’ clean antecedents, and the procedural lapse alleged in the seizure. The Court ordered that bail be granted to each petitioner on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Court, Excise‑2, Nawada.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS in making the seizure affects the bail decision.
  • Whether the petitioners’ lack of knowledge and absence of criminal antecedents warrant bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • foreign liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 41
  • seizure
  • driver
  • co‑driver
  • knowledge

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37072 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Rahul Paswan @ Rahul Kumar Son of Late Lalan Paswan Resident of
                  Village - Magalkuan, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.
           2.    Sonu Kumar Son of Om Prakash Chaudhary Resident of Village -
                 Magalkuan, P.S.- Sohsarai, District - Nalanda.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.328 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 30(a) & 41 of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a

                   pick-up van, altogether 1512 litres of foreign liquor was

                   recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

                   that nothing has been recovered from the possession of these

                   petitioners. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37072 of 2026(2) dt.18-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the seizure list are police personnel and police have not

                      complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. It has

                      been submitted that the petitioner no.1 is the driver and

                      petitioner no.2 is the co-driver of the said pick-up van. They

                      were unaware of the consignment. It has been submitted that the

                      petitioners are having no criminal antecedent and they are in

                      judicial custody since 30.03.2026.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                      petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court

                      of learned Exclusive Special Court, Excise-2, Nawada in

                      connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.328 of 2026.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.