Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jivan Prakash @ Jivan RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Jivan Prakash, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 109(1), 126(2), 352 & 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, after a co‑accused named him. The petitioner argued that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants and that, apart from the co‑accused’s confessional statement, there was no other material linking him to the offence. The State opposed bail, highlighting the petitioner’s extensive criminal antecedent involving a dozen cases. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the nature of the offences, the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner, and his willingness to cooperate with the trial. The Court granted bail on the condition of personal appearance in court, weekly attendance at the police station, and a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite his criminal antecedent and the seriousness of the offences.
  • Whether the confessional statement of a co‑accused is sufficient ground to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • Arms Act
  • high court
  • conditions of bail
  • confessional statement

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37210 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- BIHRA District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Jivan Prakash @ Jivan Ram S/o Ravindra Ram R/o Village - Piprahi, P.S -
                 Mathahi, District – Madhepura                          .. ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Subesh Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rajendra Shastri, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Bihra P.S. Case No.12 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 109(1), 126(2), 352 & 3(5) of the BNS

                   and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown

                   miscreants intercepted the bike of the informant and assaulted him

                   with butt of country made pistol.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown

                   miscreants. During course of investigation, one Deepak @ Kalia

                   was arrested and he disclosed the name of the petitioner. It has

                   been submitted that save and except the confessional statement

                   there is nothing against the petitioner. It has further been

                   submitted that thought the petitioner is having criminal antecedent
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37210 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      of 12 cases, it will transpire that most of the cases are of the year

                      2025 whereas the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025. It has

                      been submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in most of

                      the cases by police after being arrested in this case.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having

                      criminal antecedent of dozen of cases.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that

                      the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial; shall remain

                      physicall present on each and every date in the learned trial

                      court, whenever required and shall also mark his weekly

                      attendance at Pipra P.S.

                                   7. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged

                      on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand

                      only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                      of the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Saharsa in

                      connection with Bihra P.S. Case No.12 of 2025.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.