Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Praveen Kumar @ Parvin kumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Praveen Kumar, was arrested in connection with an alleged offence under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act after police recovered 1,122 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a vehicle he was alleged to have fled in. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle and was falsely implicated, asserting his innocence. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s prior case. The court, after reviewing the charge sheet and the circumstances of the arrest, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and additional safeguards. The bail was granted with specific conditions regarding surety, attendance, and cancellation on non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of innocence and lack of ownership/driver status affect bail eligibility
  • Application of Section 480(3) of the BNSS in granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 47
  • Section 480(3)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37271 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Praveen Kumar @ Parvin Kumar, son of Late Nagendra Ray, Resident of
                 Village - Rajapakar, P. S - Rajapakar, District - Vaishali

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Siwan Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 279 of 2026

                   dated 07.04.2026 registered for the alleged offence under

                   Sections 30(a) & 47 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner was

                   apprehended when he tried to flee away leaving behind his

                   vehicle from which recovery of 1122 liters of illicit foreign

                   liquor was made.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the

                   vehicle and he was arrested merely on suspicion. Nothing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37271 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          incriminating has been recovered from the person/possession of

          the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2026 and

          is having antecedent of one case. The charge sheet has been

          submitted.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioner.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          submission of charge sheet and period of custody of the

          petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned     Exclusive       Special      Excise      Court-2,   Siwan/court

          concerned in connection with Siwan (Excise) P.S. Case No. 279

          of 2026, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3)

          of BNSS and the following conditions:

                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

                       the petitioner.

                       (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each

                       and every date fixed by the court below.

                       (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive

                       dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37271 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.



                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.