Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was not granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Manoj Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered at Sheikhpura Cyber Police Station for alleged cyber fraud involving fake SIM cards and the "Dhani Fast Loans" app. He is charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner has been in custody since 4 February 2026, and the court noted the recovery of incriminating material linking him to the fraud. Considering the seriousness of the alleged offences and the evidence recovered, the court declined to grant bail. The bail application was dismissed, with the court clarifying that its observations are limited to this bail application and do not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the alleged cyber fraud and the recovery of incriminating articles.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • cyber fraud
  • fake SIM cards
  • Information Technology Act
  • sections 66C
  • sections 66D
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37317 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sheikhpura
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Kumar S/o Upendra Das Resident of Village- Jethuli, P.S.- Nadi,
                 District-Patna

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-06-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Sheikhpura Cyber P.S. Case No. 07/2026 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2)/

                   336(2)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 340(2)/ 61(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 66C/

                   66D of I.T. Act.

                                3. The petitioners are alleged to be involved in cyber

                   fraud by using fake Sim cards and mobile phones with an

                   application named as “Dhani Fast Loans”.

                                 4. The petitioners are in custody since 04.02.2026.

                                 5. Considering the fact that the petitioners have been

                   found involved in committing cyber fraud and the recovery of

                   incriminating articles involved in committing cyber fraud, I am
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37317 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

                                     6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                     7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                        herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                        application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at

                        any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                        any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.