Patna High Court
Prem SagarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.
Summary
Prem Sagar was charged under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly taking Rs. 4.70 lakh from an informant for a construction contract, failing to complete the work, and issuing bounced cheques when asked to return the money. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the cheating allegations. The court examined the nature of the accusations and the potential for the petitioner to evade trial. Considering the gravity of the offenses, the court refused the petition for anticipatory bail.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the allegations of cheating under Sections 406 and 420 IPC
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 406, 420
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- cheating
- IPC 406
- IPC 420
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37457 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-818 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya
======================================================
Prem Sagar S/o Vyas Manshi @ Vyas Bind R/o Village- Akhanpur, PS-
Alipur, Distt.- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
7 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in case registered for
the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian
Penal Code.
3. As per F.I.R., informant entered into an agreement
with this petitioner on 3.10.2016 whereby Rs. 4,70,000/- was to
be paid and construction was to be completed within six
months. It is alleged that petitioner took the entire amount from
the informant but did not complete the work and when
informant requested to return the money, informant issued two
cheques totaling Rs. 3,50,000/- which were returned due to
insufficiency of funds and later on, he failed to return the money
to the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37457 of 2025(7) dt.08-01-2026
2/2
petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Checking your session…