Mukurdhan Nut @ Makuradhan Nut @ Makurdhan NatversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37506 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2026 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Mukurdhan Nut @ Makuradhan Nut @ Makurdhan Nat S/o Late Lulha Nut
                 R/o vill - Musepur Nut Toli, P.S.- Doriganj, Distt.- Saran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Shweta Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                  Heard Ms. Shweta Anand, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, the learned A.P.P.

                   for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   10.05.2026 in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 99 of

                   2026, F.I.R. dated 22.02.2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. Recovery is of 75 liters of country-made liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that it appears from the FIR as well as the seizure list

                   that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of

                   the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from the place

                   of occurrence. The name of the petitioner has been transpired
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37506 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




          during investigation on the basis of the disclosure made by the

          local villagers and except the aforesaid, nothing has come

          during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the

          involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and the

          petitioner is in custody since 10.05.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries

          six more cases of similar nature other than the present one but

          he fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in all the cases, as

          mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-3, Saran

          at Chapra in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 99 of 2026,

          with the following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

          on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37506 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T