Patna High Court
Amar Kumar @ Amar Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that there was no ground to review its earlier order and therefore dismissed the bail application.
Summary
Amar Kumar Yadav applied for regular bail in a case (Jaynagar PS Case No. 171 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 394 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that unknown criminals looted a motorcycle and shot at an informant. The petitioner’s earlier bail application had been rejected on 23‑07‑2025. In the present hearing, counsel argued that the trial was progressing with three witnesses already examined, seeking bail. The High Court examined whether there was any ground to revisit its earlier order and found none, consequently dismissing the bail application again.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail can be granted to the petitioner for offences under IPC Sections 394, 307 and Arms Act Section 27.
- Whether the earlier order denying bail can be reviewed in light of the trial’s progress.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Indian Penal Code — s. 307, 394
Subjects
- regular bail
- IPC 394
- IPC 307
- Arms Act 27
- bail denial
- review of order
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37539 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2024 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani
======================================================
Amar Kumar @ Amar Kumar Yadav Son of Baleshwar Yadav R/o Village -
Chatra, P.S.- Khajauli, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagender Yadav, Advocate
Mr.Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 30-06-2026 Heard the parties.
2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant
of regular bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 171 of
2024 registered for the offence under Sections 394 and 307 of
the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier
the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order
dated 23.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17177 of 2025.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals
looted the motorcycle and while committing loot they have shot
at the informant.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that the trial is progressing and three witnesses
have been examined.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37539 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026
2/2
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court finds no
ground to review its earlier order.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.