Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ashwani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted as the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, no possession of the seized liquor, and the FIR did not establish an offence against him despite the Section 76(2) bar.

Summary

Ashwani Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case (Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 51 of 2026) under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police seized 23 litres of foreign liquor from a motorcycle he owned. The police arrested Nibul Kumar and Anand Kumar, who were riding the motorcycle, and the FIR implicated the petitioner solely because he was the vehicle owner. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Aquaib Khan, argued that he has no criminal antecedent and had merely lent the bike for emergency use, relying on the Patna High Court’s decision in Ram Vinay Yadav v. State of Bihar which permits anticipatory bail despite the bar in Section 76(2) if no offence is made out. The State, through an APP, opposed the bail on the ground of alleged criminal antecedent. The Court, after considering the submissions and the precedent, granted anticipatory bail with a Rs. 10,000 bond and several conditions regarding appearance, cooperation, and non‑interference with witnesses, noting the petitioner’s clean record and lack of possession of the seized liquor.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act despite the bar under Section 76(2).
  • Whether the petitioner, who merely owned the motorcycle, can be said to have committed an offence under section 30(a).
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and absence of seized goods in his possession justify granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • section 30(a)
  • section 76(2)
  • criminal antecedent
  • FIR
  • seizure of foreign liquor
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37725 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2026 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Ashwani Kumar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Aquaib Khan, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 51 of 2026 for the offence

                   registered under sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the Police intercepted

                   a motorcycle and there is recovery/seizure of 23 liter foreign

                   liquor. Nibul Kumar and Anand Kumar who were on the

                   motorcycle, got arrested. This led to the FIR.

                                4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he

                   do not have criminal antecedent and only because he owns the

                   motorcycle, got implicated. He had handed over the motorcycle

                   to Nibul Kumar who wanted it for emergency purposes.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37725 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/4




                       5. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner relied on

          the judgment of the Full Bench of Hon’ble Patna High Court in

          the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in

          2019 (2) PLJR 1089 wherein it has been held that an

          application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar

          Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar

          under Section 76(2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation

          made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made

          out.

                       5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand,

          opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail submitting that he has

          criminal antecedent.

                       7. Taking into account the submissions of the parties

          and the judgment in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra), as

          also that he do not have criminal antecedent nor anything

          recovered from his conscious possession, in that background,

          this Court is inclined to grant him the anticipatory bail with

          conditions.

                       8. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37725 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            3/4




          satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Kaimur at

          Bhabua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 51 of 2026

          subject to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner(s) shall be appearing before the

          Police Station as and when required for co-operating in the

          investigation;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every fortnight for six months to mark his

          attendance and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be

          submitted before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be

          taken for the cancellation of the bail bonds;

                       (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

          promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

          failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

          cancellation of the bail bonds;
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37725 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  (vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                     criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.