Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Munna Uraon @ Manna UraonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners, directing their release upon furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, Munna Uraon and Viplab Datta, were arrested in February 2026 for alleged manufacturing of illicit liquor under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution claimed a raid recovered 100 litres of country-made liquor, while the defence argued that no manufacturing equipment was found and the accusations were false. The petitioners had been in custody since the date of arrest, and a charge sheet had been filed. The court considered the nature of the allegations, the period of custody, and the submission of the charge sheet. It ordered the release of the petitioners on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 each, two sureties, and conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS, including attendance in court and cancellation upon default. The bail was granted subject to the specified conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 274, 275 of the Bihar Narcotic and S... Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the facts and circumstances, including the absence of manufacturing equipment and the filing of a charge sheet, justify bail.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS are applicable and sufficient.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • Section 274
  • Section 275
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 480(3)
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37729 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     Munna Uraon @ Manna Uraon, S/o Late Tetar Uraon, Resident of Village-
                  Uttari Cabin Singhiya Basti, Khushkibag, P.S- Sadar, District- Purnea
           2.    Viplab Datta @ Biplab Datta, S/o Subal Chandra Datta R/o village - Station
                 Road, Shubhash Nagar, Khushkibag, P.S.- Sadar, Distt.- Purnea

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Ms.Nidhi Suman, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in

                   connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.100/2026 dated 20.02.2026,

                   registered for the offences under Sections 274 & 275 of BNS

                   and Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As         per    prosecution     case,    police     received

                   information about the petitioner no. 1 Munna Uraon

                   manufacturing illicit liquor in his house. A raid was conducted

                   and the petitioners were apprehended while trying to flee away

                   from the spot. From the search of the house of petitioner no.1,

                   recovery of 100 liters of country made liquor was made.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37729 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

          case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the

          person/possession of the petitioners. The allegation of

          manufacturing the illicit liquor in the house of the petitioner

          no.1 is false and concocted as no equipment for manufacturing

          of illicit liquor was recovered from the said place. The

          petitioners are in custody since 20.02.2026. The petitioner no.1

          is having antecedents of two cases, whereas the petitioner no.2

          is having clean antecedent. The charge sheet has been

          submitted.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioners.

                       6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of allegation, period of custody of the petitioners and

          submission of charge sheet, the petitioners are directed to be

          released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

          Excise Court No.1, Purnea/ concerned court, in connection with

          Sadar P.S. Case No.100/2026, subject to the conditions
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37729 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
                                                       3/3




                     mentioned in Section 480 (3) of BNSS and also the following

                     conditions :

                                             (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                             relative of the petitioners.

                                             (ii) The petitioners will remain present on

                                             each and every date fixed by the below, if

                                             so required by the learned trial court.

                                             (iii) In case of absence on three

                                             consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                             terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                             petitioners will be liable to be cancelled

                                             by the court concerned.



                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.