Patna High Court
Rakesh Sahani @ Rakesh Kumar SahaniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, subject to prescribed conditions.
Summary
Petitioner Rakesh Sahani sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with FIR No. 290/2024, which alleged that a drunken group fired shots at a marriage ceremony, resulting in the death of Lucky Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated, noting that a separate FIR (No. 294/2024) concerning the same incident had already resulted in the grant of anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the petitioner was involved in another case and should not be released. The Court observed that the same set of allegations under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Arms Act were the basis of two FIRs and that anticipatory bail had already been granted in the earlier case. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail in the present petition, subject to conditions under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNSS, including a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and compliance with specified conduct requirements.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the petitioner is not named in the FIR but is implicated during investigation
- Whether the grant of anticipatory bail in a prior FIR for the same set of allegations precludes denial of bail in the present FIR
- Whether the provisions of Section 438 CrPC and Section 482 BNSS are applicable to the petitioner's request
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1B)(a), 25(9), 26, 27
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 103, 238, 3(5), 61
- Code of Criminal Procedure — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- false implication
- multiple FIRs
- Arms Act
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Section 438 CrPC
- Section 482 BNSS
- bail conditions
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37891 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
Rakesh Sahani @ Rakesh Kumar Sahani S/o Vishwanath Sahani Resident of
Village - Kansh Pakri, P.S.- Madhuban, District - East Champaran, Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Karandeep Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-07-2026 Heard Mr.Karandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 290 of 2024, F.I.R.
dated 15.07.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections
238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(9),
27 of Arms Act and after amalgamation Sections are also
converted under Sections 238,103,61 of BNS and Sections
25(1B)(a),26,27,25(9) of Arms Act.
3. According to prosecution case, all the accused
persons named in the FIR in a drunken state started firing in the
air in a marriage ceremony where one bullet got hit to Lucky
Kumar who sustained injury and during course of his treatment,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37891 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
2/4
he died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner
has been transpired during investigation. Further submits that
for the same set of allegation another FIR i.e. Madhuban
P.S.Case No. 294 of 2024 was instituted in which the petitioner
is named in the FIR and he has been granted privilege of
anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court
vide order dated 07.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.17435 of
2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the
same set of allegation, the present FIR has been instituted in
which the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and the petitioner
carries one more case other than the present one but fairly
submits that the petitioner is on bail in the said case, as
mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, for the same set of
allegation, two FIRs have been instituted, in another FIR, the
petitioner has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a
Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court as mentioned in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37891 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
3/4
aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his
arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of
thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, East Champaran in
connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 290 of 2024, subject
to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code
of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with
other following conditions:-
(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37891 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
4/4
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.