Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raj Kumar Rai @ Raj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the injury was simple and did not demonstrate an intention to cause death, and therefore granted bail to the petitioners.

Summary

Petitioners Raj Kumar Rai and Manti Devi were named in an FIR for alleged assault on informant Suraj Singh during a trivial neighbourhood dispute, with charges under IPC sections 341, 448, 324, 323, 307 and 504 read with 34. The petitioners contended that the incident was a mutual free fight, the injury to Suraj Singh was simple and did not demonstrate an intention to cause death, and they have clean antecedents. The State, aided by the informant’s counsel, presented a photograph showing eight stitched wounds to argue the seriousness of the assault. The Court examined the nature of the injury, the circumstances of the fight, and relevant Supreme Court precedent, concluding that the injury was not of a nature to attract a charge of attempted murder under Section 307. Consequently, the Court ordered the petitioners to be released on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether the facts constitute an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (attempt to murder).
  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the nature of the injury and the circumstances of the altercation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • attempt to murder
  • Section 307 IPC
  • neighbourhood dispute
  • simple injury
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38000 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2024 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Raj Kumar Rai @ Raj Kumar, Son of Ramananad Rai,
           2.    Manti Devi @ Fulmanti Devi, Wife of Raj Kumar Rai,
                 Resident of Village-Khirodhrpur, P.S.- Khursrupur, District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioners
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Md. Musowir, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                 For the Informant       :        Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Dinkar Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   22-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State duly

                   assisted by learned counsel appearing for the informant.

                                2. Both accused/petitioners are named in the FIR

                   and apprehending their arrest in connection with Khusrupur

                   P.S. Case No.1 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 448,

                   324, 323, 307 and 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal

                   Code.

                                3.    Allegation against petitioners is to assault

                   informant and others during the occurrence for trivial

                   neighbourhood dispute, due to which, the nephew of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38000 of 2025(5) dt.22-01-2026
                                            2/4




          informant, namely, Suraj Singh received injuries during the

          occurrence, which is specifically alleged to be caused by this

          petitioner with intention to cause death.

                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

          petitioners that admittedly the parties are neighbours and out

          of trivial issues, the present occurrence took place. It is

          pointed out that the injury as alleged to be received by injured

          Suraj Singh, upon medical examination found simple in

          nature but, was alleged to be caused by sharp object. It is

          pointed out that the nature of injury is not only the criteria as

          to constitute prima facie the offence under Section 307 of the

          Indian Penal Code, as there are several factors, which

          required to be taken into consideration like, nature of

          weapons, pre and post conduct of accused, the manner of

          assault, the part of body on which assault was made, etc. In

          support of his submission, learned counsel has relied upon

          legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available through

          Jage Ram vs. State of Haryana & Ors. [(2015) 11 SCC

          366].

                       5. Arguing further, it is submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38000 of 2025(5) dt.22-01-2026
                                            3/4




          occurrence was free fight in nature, where both parties

          received injuries and for same set of occurrence, the

          petitioners’ side lodged a complaint case, where informant

          has already granted bail by the learned trial court itself. It is

          pointed out that both petitioners are men of clean antecedent.

                       6.     Learned APP for the State duly assisted by

          learned counsel appearing for the informant submitted that

          the allegation to cause assault is specifically available against

          these petitioners. In support of his submission, he shows a

          photograph of injured showing eight stitched wounds to

          support the submission qua magnitude of assault as alleged to

          be made by these petitioners during the course of occurrence.

                       7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact, as the injury alleged to be caused by these

          petitioners, upon medical examination, found simple in nature

          that also not appears repeated, without having any

          intervening circumstances, negating intention to cause death

          on its face, accordingly, both petitioners, above-named, in the

          event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, are directed to be released
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38000 of 2025(5) dt.22-01-2026
                                                      4/4




                    on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                    Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to

                    the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class,

                    Patna City, Patna in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case

                    No.1 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                    Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short

                    ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik

                    Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short ‘BNSS’).


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.