Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The High Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging his involvement in the seizure of 41.250 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution alleged that he fled the scene, while the petitioner claimed innocence and offered to donate Rs. 25,000 to a charitable organization without admitting guilt. The court, after hearing both sides, exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and granted anticipatory bail, imposing conditions including a monetary deposit, regular police station attendance, and verification of a clean antecedent. The bail bonds were set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to compliance with the stipulated conditions. The order clarified that its observations were prima facie and not to influence the trial's merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving alleged illicit liquor possession.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and willingness to make a charitable donation justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are lawful and appropriate.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • clean antecedent
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38172 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2026 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Kumar Son of Daroga Ray R/o village - Pojhi Bichala Tola , P.s-
                 Derni , District - Saran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Vinod Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umesh Lal Verma
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-06-2026                   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned counsel for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with

                   Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 245 of 2026 registered for offences

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   41.250 liters of illicit liquor. The petitioner is alleged to have

                   fled away from the spot.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence.

                   He further submits that the petitioner is ready to donate Rs.

                   25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) in some

                   charitable organization without accepting his guilt. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38172 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this

          application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the

          Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below

          where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with

          Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 245 of 2026 subject to the conditions as

          laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and with further

          condition(s) that:-

                                               (I). The petitioner shall deposit an
                                  amount of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
                                  Thousand Only) in Ramakrishna Mission
                                  Ashrama, Latu Maharaj Path, Opp. Circuit
                                  House, Chapra, Bihar and produce the
                                  receipt of the same before the Court below.
                                  The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be
                                  accepted after verifying the genuineness of
                                  the receipt produced by the petitioner.
                                               (ii). The petitioner is directed to
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38172 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                                              mark his attendance at Derni Police Station
                                              on every 1st and 3rd Sunday of each month.
                                              Failure to do so will result in cancellation of
                                              bail bond of the petitioner.
                                                           (iii). At the time of accepting the
                                              bail bonds of the petitioner, the Court below
                                              shall verify the fact whether the petitioner
                                              has clean antecedent or not. If it is found
                                              that the petitioner has clean antecedent then
                                              only his bail bonds shall be accepted by the
                                              Court below.
                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.