Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Harendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Turki PS Case No. 138 of 2026) involving alleged possession of 71 litres of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They claimed innocence and offered to donate Rs. 25,000 each to charity without admitting guilt. The State opposed the relief. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, a mandatory deposit of Rs.25,000 in a charitable institution, monthly attendance at the police station, and verification of clean antecedents for two of the petitioners. The order emphasized that the observations were prima facie and not a determination on the merits. The bail was conditioned under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case of alleged illicit liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the conditions imposed, including monetary deposit and periodic police attendance, are permissible under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedents

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38195 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2026 Thana- TURKI KHARARU District-
                                                       Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Harendra Ray Son of Late Nunnu Ray Resident of Village- Gawshra, P.S.-
                  Turki, District- Muzaffarpur.
           2.    Vivek Kumar Son of Harendra Ray Resident of Village- Gawshra, P.S.-
                 Turki, District- Muzaffarpur.
           3.    Abhishek Kumar Son of Harendra Ray Resident of Village- Gawshra, P.S.-
                 Turki, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ratneshwar Prasad
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-06-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   learned counsel for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with

                   Turki P.S. Case No. 138 of 2026 registered for offences under

                   Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. There is recovery of approx 71 liters of illicit liquor

                   from the cowshed of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any

                   offence. It is further submitted that the petitioners are ready to

                   donate Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38195 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                            2/3




          in some charitable organization without accepting their guilt. It

          is further submitted that petitioner no. 1 has two criminal

          antecedents, whereas petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have clean

          antecedents.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, this

          application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in

          the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in

          the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          concerned Court below in connection with Turki P.S. Case No.

          138 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 482(2) of the BNSS and with further conditions that:-

                                            (I). The petitioners shall deposit
                                  an amount of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
                                  Five Thousand Only) in Ramakrishna
                                  Mission Sevashrama, Swami Vivekananda
                                  Path, Bela, Muzaffarpur, Bihar and produce
                                  the receipt of the same before the Court
                                  below. The bail bonds of the petitioners shall
                                  be accepted after verifying the genuineness
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38195 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                                              of the receipts produced by them.
                                                        (ii). The petitioners are directed to
                                              mark their attendance at Turki Police
                                              Station on every 1st and 3rd Sunday of each
                                              month. Failure to do so will result in
                                              cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners.
                                                        (iii). At the time of accepting the
                                              bail bonds of the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, the
                                              Court below shall verify the fact whether the
                                              petitioner nos 2 and 3 have clean
                                              antecedents or not. If it is found that the
                                              petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have clean
                                              antecedents then only their bail bonds shall
                                              be accepted by the Court below.


                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.