Patna High Court
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar SahversusThe state of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and specified conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, was arrested on 19 April 2026 in connection with the seizure of 59 litres of codeine‑containing cough syrup, alleged to be a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. He contends that he was falsely implicated, arguing that his name was added to the FIR only because the recovered motorcycle belonged to him and that no substantive evidence links him to the offence. The petitioner also highlighted that a co‑accused, Niraj Kumar Sah, had previously been granted bail in a similar case. The State opposed bail, noting that the petitioner has another pending case and is already on bail in that matter. After considering the circumstances, the Court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering of evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order was made subject to the satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Judge, Excise‑II, Araria.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement, based solely on ownership of a recovered motorcycle, warrants continued detention.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents and pending cases affect the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition act
- codeine
- excise
- criminal procedure
- seizure
- drug offence
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38432 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2021 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria
======================================================
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar Sah S/O Mahendra Sah @ Mahendra Soni
Resident Of Village - Khajurbari , Ward No.- 15 Police Station - Jogbani,
District - Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The state of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 19-06-2026 Heard Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, learned APP
for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
19.04.2026, in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 271 of
2021, F.I.R. dated 01.12.2021 registered for the offences
punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise
Act, 2016.
3. Recovery is of 59.00 litres of Codeine contain
Dialex DC Cough Syrup.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case. He further submits that initially the petitioner was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38432 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026
2/3
not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been
transpired during investigation on the basis that one motorcycle
was recovered from the place of occurrence and petitioner
happens to be the owner of the motorcycle in question and
except the aforesaid, nothing cogent material has come during
investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the
present occurrence. He further submits that co-accused person
namely, Niraj Kumar Sah has been granted bail by this Court
vide order dated 10.05.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 278 of
2022. He further submits that the police after investigation
submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner
is in custody since 19.04.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the
petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case
other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of
paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in
the pending matter.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38432 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026
3/3
learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II, Araria in connection
with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 271 of 2021, subject to the
following conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.