Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Sanoj Kumar Ray was implicated in a criminal case (No. 318 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 323, 341, 376, 506/34 and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, involving alleged sexual assault and intimidation of a complainant. The petitioner claimed he was not present at the scene and was falsely implicated, seeking anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail, highlighting a prior similar criminal antecedent of the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the seriousness of the allegations and the prior record. The Court refused the petitioner's anticipatory bail application, concluding that the circumstances did not warrant bail at this stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the alleged offences and his prior criminal antecedent

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • sexual assault
  • IPC
  • POCSO
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail refusal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38467 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Kumar Ray Son of Jayashiyaram Ray @ Jay Siyaram
                 Ray Resident of Village-Kalyanpur, Police Station-Sonepur, District-Saran at
                 Chapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ms. X Daughter of Ramayan Thakur Resident of Village- Kalyanpur, P.S.-
                 Sonpur, District- Vaishali.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-06-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Sonpur P. S. Case

                   No. 318 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 323, 341, 376, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and

                   Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

                   Act.

                                3. It is alleged that this petitioner along with other

                   accused persons entered the house of informant, sexually

                   assaulted and threatened her not to disclose the ordeal to

                   anyone.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38467 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        was not present at the place of occurrence at the relevant time

                        and has falsely been implicated in this case.

                                     5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed

                        the bail application and submitted that petitioner has got one

                        criminal antecedent of similar nature.

                                     6. Considering the nature and seriousness of

                        accusation and criminal antecedent of similar nature, prayer for

                        anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.