Patna High Court
Parma Ray @ Parma RaiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioners, directing them to furnish the requisite bond and sureties.
Summary
Petitioners Parma Ray and Vishal Yadav applied for bail fearing arrest in Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act (BNS) including assault and criminal intimidation. They claimed innocence, alleged false implication, and highlighted a counter‑case and lack of prior criminal record, asserting the FIR indicated a road‑rage incident. The learned counsel argued that the petitioners were unlikely to flee and that bail was appropriate. The Court examined the allegations and, noting the circumstances, allowed the bail application. The petitioners were directed to secure bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNS.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 482 of the Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act.
- Whether the petitioners pose a flight risk or threat to the investigation in the context of the alleged road‑rage incident.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act — s. 109, 113(1), 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 482
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- bail
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Section 438
- Section 482
- road rage
- false implication
- high court
- Bihar Negotiable and Securities Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38655 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2026 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
======================================================
1. Parma Ray @ Parma Rai S/O Late Mahesh Rai R/o Vill- Murathan, P.S-
Sonpur, Dist- Saran at Chapra, Bihar
2. Vishal Yadav @ Vishal Kumar S/o Parma Ray @ Parma Rai R/o Vill-
Murathan, P.S- Sonpur, Dist- Saran at Chapra, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in
connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026 registered for
the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 113(1), 352,
351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are
accused of assaulted the victim.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have
falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that
there is counter case also and the petitioner side has also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38655 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
2/2
received injuries. He further submits that the petitioners has no
criminal antecedent.
5. From the reading of the FIR, it appears to be a
case of road rage.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application
is allowed.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of
their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below
within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court
below in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026,
subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.