Patna High Court
Md. Parvez @ Md. ParwezversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Anticipatory bail was not granted to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Parvez, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession and trafficking of various narcotic preparations seized from an e‑rickshaw. The prosecution alleged that the seized items, including codeine‑containing cough syrup, Nitravet, Nitrazip, and tramadol capsules, belonged to the petitioner, who had allegedly instructed the driver to deliver them across the border. The petitioner applied for anticipatory bail, seeking protection from arrest pending trial. The Court examined the seriousness of the offences, the nature of the seized contraband, and the risk of the petitioner absconding or tampering with evidence. Considering these factors, the Court declined to grant anticipatory bail and ordered the petitioner to surrender within four weeks to obtain regular bail. The order is limited to the anticipatory bail application and does not prejudice the petitioner’s position in subsequent proceedings.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act.
- Whether the facts disclosed justify denial of anticipatory bail on grounds of seriousness of offence and risk of tampering or absconding.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- NDPS Act
- drug trafficking
- seizure of narcotics
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3878 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria
======================================================
Md. Parvez @ Md. Parwez Son of Md Anif Resident of Village and Post -
Rampur, PS- Forbesganj, District- Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 20-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with
Jogbani P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 registered for offences under
Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, The prosecution case,
in brief, is that during the course of patrolling, at about 9:16
AM., the informant, namely N. Ranjit Singh ASI, 56th
Battallion, SSB Bathnaha, stopped an e-rickshaw coming from
the side of Forbesganj on suspicion. A sack found on the e-
rickshaw was searched, in which Eskuf Cough Syrup (Codeine
Phosphate & Triprolidine Hydrochloride)—90 bottles, each 100
ml (total 9 liters); Nitravet 10 (10 mg)—2,220 tablets (total
22,200 mg); Nitrazip 10 (10 mg)—1,500 tablets (total 15,000
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3878 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
2/3
mg); and Spasmoproxyvon Plus (Tramadol Hydrochloride)—
2,160 capsules, each containing 50 mg Tramadol Hydrochloride
were found. The driver of the e-rickshaw, namely Irshad,
disclosed that the alleged articles belonged to Md. Parwez, who
had given them to him for delivery at the border. A seizure list
was prepared. On the basis of the written report, the present case
was registered.
4. Considering the allegations levelled against the
petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case.
5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is
hereby rejected.
6. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court
below within a period of four weeks from today and seek
regular bail, failing which the Superintendent of Police, Araria
will take all steps for the arrest of the petitioner.
7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made
herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application
and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any
subsequent stage of the proceedings.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the
Superintendent of Police, Araira through FAX for its compliance
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3878 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026
3/3
forthwith.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…